翻訳と辞書 |
National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Szukhent : ウィキペディア英語版 | National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Szukhent
''National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Szukhent'', 375 U.S. 311 (1964), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that service of process upon a party's designated agent does not invalidate personal jurisdiction that would otherwise be established, if the agent gives prompt notice to the party. ==Background== Defendants Szukhents, farmers in Michigan, entered into a contractual relationship with plaintiff National Equipment Rental, a New York-based company, for the leasing of farm equipment. This contract, written by National Equipment Rental, included a term designating Florence Weinberg, at a New York address, as agent for service of process regarding the contract. The Szukhents had never met Ms. Weinberg. In suing the Szukhents in Federal court (E.D.N.Y.), National Equipment Rental served process upon Ms. Weinberg, who then notified the Szukhents of the suit via mail.〔375 U.S. at 313-314.〕 Subject-matter jurisdiction was founded upon diversity of citizenship.〔375 U.S. at 313 n. 2.〕 The Szukhents challenged personal jurisdiction on the grounds that there was no constitutional basis for personal jurisdiction.〔375 U.S. at 313-314.〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Szukhent」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|